An opportunity rather than a threat?
By Detlef on Tuesday, October 16 2007, 11:45 - Permalink
In many parts of Europe, the local population is ageing, partly through declining birth rates, partly because young people leave in search for employment. However, at the same time other regions are undergoing rejuvenation, not least due to the impact of immigration. In some areas of our continent, such developments even take place in parallel, leading to significant changes in the demographic and ethnic set up of the population.
How does this affect societies in Europe – their structure, their culture, their cohesion? How does it affect Europe’s relationship with a predominantly younger world, in which many countries especially in Africa and Asia have a birth rate much higher than Europe’s average?
Whilst this debate generally is dominated by valid concerns about the negative impact of ageing or shrinking populations, recently an increasing number of voices seem to highlight that smaller and more mature societies may also bring a lot of benefits – less pressure on the environment, a smaller carbon footprint, less crime, less unemployment, new markets for new products, to name but a few.
Comments
This seems like a problem which is overwhelming Europe. What kind of insights could you give us to better understand this problem? What are the solutions to it ?
In my opinion this is a European and not a national problem.
Ageing societies are a good thing,meaning that one lives a longer life. However it should lead to a new balanced situation, where population does not have to grow in numbers, but where growth is measured in life quality. It should be quite obvious that excessive growth will simply lead to crowded conditions where space is scarce. The question is : has a steady " No growth" population psychologically a negative influence on the economy? Statistically oriented economists seem to think so. This is not logical. New additional population needs new infrastructures, these are being paid by their elders. Obviously parents with one child will leave more wealth to their offspring than parents with 3 of 4 children. Quality is better than numbers.